![borland c++ 64 bits borland c++ 64 bits](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ODxh2AiLHSY/UqBla4wneTI/AAAAAAAAACA/E1_pst7ljxs/s1600/2.gif)
- #BORLAND C++ 64 BITS 64 BIT#
- #BORLAND C++ 64 BITS 32 BIT#
- #BORLAND C++ 64 BITS PORTABLE#
- #BORLAND C++ 64 BITS CODE#
A developer who created the macro _x86_64 doesn't understand that x86 stands for a 32-bit platform and 64-part stands for a 64-bit platform. It is the most illogical macro in GCC-world I've ever seen. Note: _M_IX8616 is the project's internal macro defined for all 16-bit platforms. #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Motorola Processing Unit ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for PowerPc Processing Unit ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Alpha Processing Unit ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Mips Processing Unit ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for SH Processing Unit ***" )
![borland c++ 64 bits borland c++ 64 bits](https://techrrival.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/C-Plus-Plus.jpg)
#pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for ARM Processing Unit ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Intel Processing Unit ( 64-bit Itanium ) ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for AMD Processing Unit ( 64-bit ) ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Intel Processing Unit ( 64-bit ) ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Intel Processing Unit ( 32-bit ) ***" ) #pragma message ( "*** Message: Compiling for Intel Processing Unit ( 16-bit ) ***" ) Note: A universal term Processing Unit is used instead of CPU, APU or SOC HRT Abstraction Layer Declarations - Processing Units Dependent
#BORLAND C++ 64 BITS PORTABLE#
I consider that notation ( a Microsoft-like ) as more neutral and this is how it is used on a project I work for ( however, the project is highly portable and isolated from Microsoft's Win32 API for 99.99% ): I don't think that _ M_ stands for Microsoft and it stands for Machine. >.The _ M_(ARCH) style macros are those defined by MSVC. In two cases it is the same as _M_X64 ( for a 64-bit platform only ). # if defined ( _M_X64 ) || defined ( _x86_64_ ) // the latter for MinGW supportĪs you can see two variants of macros are used, that is _x86_64 and _x86_64_. However, this is how Intel uses that macro: I will check and report results your testcase with a 32-bit MinGW v3.4.2.
#BORLAND C++ 64 BITS 32 BIT#
>.I don't have the 32 bit intel compilers installed, but the result would be the same as the 32 bit gcc testcase.
![borland c++ 64 bits borland c++ 64 bits](https://netslovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/trabajo-de-informatica-7-638.jpg)
Syntax is: BCC32 file * = default -x- = turn switch x off Here is their final notice for the C++ compiler:īorland C++ 5.5.1 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993, 2000 Borland It looks like No before 2000 year ( around these times it moved to Delphi and C++ Builder but with a different company name ).
#BORLAND C++ 64 BITS 64 BIT#
Am I missing something?īig thanks ahead of time for any direction that can be provided.>Did Borland ever produce a 64 bit compiler?. I checked the (EDIT)Include(/EDIT) folder and the iostream.h file is there and seems to be an exact copy of the iostream.h file on the school computer.
![borland c++ 64 bits borland c++ 64 bits](https://www.tenouk.com/BbuilderX_files/cppborlandbuilderx007.png)
When I installed Borland I did make sure to modify the bcc32.cfg file with:
#BORLAND C++ 64 BITS CODE#
Here is the source code for our first in class project, the infamous "Hello World": Don't know if it makes any difference, but I am running Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. While using the school computers, my code is compiling and running decently, but when I try to compile and run from home (to check my work before turning it in) I some errors. Brand new to programming and I'm taking an Intro to Programming and Logic in school.